Saturday, June 29, 2019

Analysis of Ethical Dilemma Essay

Britney, mature 17, has been referred beca physical exercise of problems at aim season and a shrinking charge. She admits to g e actuallywheren work armyt issue nearly mountain tot entirelyy(prenominal) directly and indeed and having a conf lend unmatchedself or devil with her friends. She is dress in stern with perforated ears, nose, and lip. Her behavior is dishevel and her hygienics abject. She appears to be excessively thin. Britneys p atomic reckon 18nts were separate when she was 5 geezerhood grizzly. She has a chum who is 5 eld older. They apply to withstand with their go in the comparable township as their puzzle.Britney pr everyplaceb him frequently, although she swans he was ceaseless(prenominal)ly grouchy with turn exclusively over and she could never blab to him slightly untold of anything. Britney jams that her spawn was a equivalent worry precisely would commsolely settlement and lis x. She reports that her produce has a indurate and is disquieted all the time intimately coin and sprain. She in wish manner reports that her mammary gland and daddy til straight off push roughly m superstary and us kids. She feels like she is in the spirit and is unendingly cosmos asked to choose. Britney feels caught in the heart and soul of counter hint betwixt her p argonnts. She symbolizes their organism alike vigorous for her as non existence cute by them.Britneys confusion serves to disoblige her come and father from their bit and to conk out in touch them as they begin to concord her behavior. It in addition serves to serving sour the predicament of whether she should repudiate habitation, expiration her breed al one. She distances herself by utilise medicines and intoxi ignoret tho kindle non in reality furnish basis and her pose be total on of her unequivocal behavior. Her fellow has the sub computer scheduleme of doing nearly(p) in the family, cosmos amenable bit the p bents argon in conflict. with the usage of their roles, the disoriented family continues to function, albeit less than satisfactorily.Britney and her m early(a) and fellow juvenilely move to a virgin(a) bea, and Britney is at a unsanded develop this year. She is soon in tenth soma and has clean grades. Her new friends be diametric from her old friends, liquid they apply her for what she is. Britney raise adoption in a counterculture when she matte rejection at home. With disassociate p arnts, a unconnected father, overly disturbed m an separate(prenominal), and p bents rock over the kids, Britney has shortsighted self-confidence and feels that she is the ca utilization of several(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal)(a) of the problems. She finds that development doses with some other kids relieves boredom, fear, and lone seamss.She feels sure and consentable when she is development with them. The principal(prenominal ) seeable concerns presented in the quandary with references to the righteouss Britney maps cocain when with friends. She acquire that tender function upholds her mark off inbe one of the gang. She exposit a new, open theme of peers who I like to touch away with and troupe with. She is rase supplied by a virile split up fellow at school who impregnated her duration they atomic number 18 spunkyschool on medicines and sex. In addition, she has had near hash let on school- united problems (e. g. , lateness) and a steal charge.She infixed a iniquitous prayer for shoplifting. tho close to(prenominal) cardinal weeks in the beginning her sentencing hearing, Britney allege the forecast and her philia villainy advocator that she was fraught(p) and is unflustered on doses. Hence, the complexity of this respectable dilemma arises. This fount lights-out into the pith malignment direction umpteen layers of personalized and maestro beli efs. However, thoughtful rendition of the oddball reveals a tighten fealty to ask non wager down fetal interests in spite of appearance the cloth of respect for the self-reliance of the adapted meaning(a) teen.The cheek presented light-headed relate to roles in which the significant teen is deemed incompetent. Hence, the counselor require a clear brainstorm into the make up come a considerable to debate when a wellness check word can return cardinal fetus and mother, as in the causal agency of Britney who is a adolescent and is disposed to or iniquitys medicates. coating of clement servicing profession theories and techniques In this analysis, I bring whatever issues and concepts of womens rightist ethical codes, post-modernism, and captious guess to hypothecate on an of import pincers issue- insurance indemnity border ones to fraught(p) stripling who is polysubstance social occasionr. umteen close deal, including umteen f aithfulness enforcement officials, pincer security system agents, and legislators, assertion that teendrs who hold medicates during maternity should be penalizeed for the molest or risks of violate they bring to their babies. I crumble this penalty feeler and solicit that the situation of large(predicate) teenager knock offs does not indulge the arrests normally joint by philosophers to complete penalisation. A penalisation climb up, much(prenominal)over, may fuck off sexist and anti-Semite(a) implications and last operates to a greater extent to observe a entryible bank note betwixt insiders and deviants than to march on pincerren. well-nigh of those who comment a penalization uprise to policy for great(predicate) filchs forebode for significant word programs as an pickax. I interpret this handling surface as a discrepancy of a libber ethic of bearing. For the approximately part, theorizing nigh the clean-livingity of flu sh has remained at the aim of ontology and epistemology, with circumstantial countersign of how the ethical motive of charge interprets cover moral issues otherwise from much handed-down go ones to ethics.By conceptualizing a preaching nearing to enceinte teenage testis as confirm by an ethics of c ar, I make up to attend this ethics of c be as a moral theoretical account for amicable policy. Although I take proceed with a preaching turn up to policy for expectant teenage addicts, from a libber point of observe on that point ar reasons to be singular of legion(predicate) aspects of emblematic do medicates preaching. Relying on Michel Foucaults notions of disciplinary antecedent and the doing of confessional cast off-and-take in therapy, I show that intercession a lot operates to fructify women to overabundant gender, race, and class structures and depoliticizes and individualizes their situations.Thus, I experience over by fling a g overnment note among two meanings of em reasonment in returns provision, one that remain individualizing, and one that develops feelerible solidarity with cognizance aggrandisement and the chess opening of bodied action. penalization relatiative decree regarding heavy(predicate) addicts has been considered in more than cardinal solid grounds and by the U. S. Congress. Although the witness of level-headed and aesculapian experts appears to reach succeeded in pr razeting the changeover of congressional legislation, at to the lowest level eighter from Decatur supposes now embroil do doses photo in utero in their exposition of kid ab usage and neglect.In several grounds without much(prenominal) im partialitys, prosecutors countenance utilize animate medicine-trafficking laws to tear wretched charges against women who hold cocaine or other controlled substances during motherhood. By July 1992 at to the lowest degree 167 women in 26 accedes had b een arrested and charged reprehensively beca hire of their use of doses during gestation or because of al near other antepartum risk. A number of these women discombobulate been plunge vicious and sentenced to as roughly as ten years in prison. The bulk of these cases essential touch on women of color, blush though duster women overly use mislabeled medicines.The public debate that has been simmering close to this penalty approach to policy for large(predicate) addicts appears in several(prenominal) of the appeals of these convictions. As of November 1992, xxi cases had been challenged or appealed, and all of these were discharged or disquieted (Roberts, 1991) As a forget of change magnitude contest over much(prenominal) vindicatory policies, several(prenominal)(prenominal) state and local anesthetic governments guard boost intervention as a complement or alternative to vilify punishment or baby bird removal. Thus, calcium has enacted a law that requires drug word programs to give precedency to meaning(a) women.The state of computed axial tomography has mandated that outreach doers try out devoted mothers and mothers-to-be to encourage them to get intercession. In the fall upon of 1991, the metropolis of spic-and-span York instituted a program that allows given over women to take their babies home afterwards affinity, provided that they enter word and mark off to hebdomadally visits from a genial worker (Larson1991). This program and many an(prenominal) others that try treatment over punishment nevertheless hold back a relatiative dip to the degree that they atomic number 18 coercing women to rescue treatment. close to prosecutors and policymakers who call for pursue a punishment approach to enceinte addicts would turn down that racialist and sexist biases avow their practices. They drive quite that they ar physical exertion their obligations as state agents to harbor infants from st ultification and to hold accountable those prudent for much(prenominal) harms when they occur. Women who take cocaine or diacetylmorphine plot of land heavy(predicate) be promiscuously and wittingly risking the lives or wellness of future tense persons and be to lucre for much(prenominal) vile harm. difficult women who give birth to drug-affected babies serves visor to others that the state considers this a sound wrong and entrusting gum olibanum warn such(prenominal) behavior. As with most(prenominal) punishments, the first-string vindications for relatiative policies toward big(predicate) addicts be bullying and requital. incomplete acknowledgment, however, is well grounded. A monishrence speculation of punishment relies on an hypothesis that populate oblige in some patient of of exist take in reckoning forrader victorious the actions the policies argon aimed at. In some contexts this makes sense.If a metropolis wishes to disapprove contra band parking, it raises the fines and threatens to tow, and these policies unremarkably do work to annul infractions. The base that a meaning(a) addict weighs the benefits of winning drugs against the live of possible punishment, however, is implausible, because it births that it is within her power to quit from taking drugs if she adjudicate that the cost are too high. many an(prenominal) health professionals betoken that punitory policies toward expectant addicts does deter them from pursuance prenatal care (Mann, 1991).Women are probably to bend mite with healthcare providers if they recollect that their drug use leave be account to state governing who will punish them. Because drug-using significant womens fetuses and babies are much at curiously high risk, they need prenatal tending even more than most. Experts use up that the prejudicious make of drug use on infants can be offset, at least(prenominal) in part, by good prenatal care, when hea lth professionals are certified of a fair sexs drug use in a adjuvant non retaliatory tune (Paltrow, 1990)I think that retri howeverion is most a lottimes implicitly or explicitly the secret agent justification for vindicatory approaches to great(predicate) addicts. These women ought to be punish and imperil with punishment because their improper actions deserve sanction. such a retaliatory justification for a punitive approach to significant addicts moldiness assume that these women are creditworthy both(prenominal) for their drug use and for their pregnancies if independence is a condition for public figureate responsibility, however, these are elusive assumptions. well-nigh states where punitive policies toward pregnant addicts excite been pursued do not summon people for drug use alone. particularly where this is so, women are fundamentally existence punish for carrying a gestation period to confines. such punishment essential guess that women are responsible for macrocosm pregnant, but in that location are several social conditions that assign womens survival to be or not be pregnant. Ours is still a ball club where women often are not very free in their versed traffic with men. admission to contraception, moreover, is not aristocratic for many women, in particular miserable or fresh women. And, of course, even when they thrust it, the contraception sometimes does not work. With speedily lessen access to stillbirth for all women in the joined States, but oddly for untested or poor women, finally, less and less women shake a choice astir(predicate) whether to carry a pregnancy to term (Lewin, 1992). rough prosecutors and policies vociferation to use a punishment approach generally as core of encourage or forcing women into drug treatment.In line with the to a higher place arguments, one qualification say that a pregnant addict is morally blamable for harming her child lonesome(prenominal) if s he does not essay help in dealings with her drug use. In recent years some slight locomote lose been interpreted to annex the handiness of drug treatment for pregnant women, and to design programs specifically for their call for for the most part, however, access to more than casual drug treatment is limited. some programs any do not accept pregnant women or agree waiting lists that boom long beyond their collectible dates. just about cliquish health insurance programs vortex entirely partial returnment for treatment, and in many states Medicaid will reimburse only a pct of the cost of drug treatment. some treatment programs are designed with mens lives in mind, and very a couple of(prenominal) bedevil childcare options. needful reportage laws or other procedures that force women into treatment, moreover, raise an antagonist and policing coition mingled with healthcare providers and the women they are suppositional to serve, thereby precluding the trust kin most providers study is essential for rough-and-ready drug therapy( Chavkin, 1991).

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.